plasticity
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| plasticity [2020/03/11 13:22] – pericles | plasticity [2020/03/11 13:30] (current) – pericles | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <font 20px/ | <font 20px/ | ||
| - | Motivated by several manufacturing processes, such as cold metal forming and additive manufacturing, | + | Motivated by several manufacturing processes, such as cold metal forming and additive manufacturing, |
| - | In the first step, we develop | + | We present a large strain viscoelastic-viscoplastic model by coupling visco-elastic and visco-plastic models based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient. Regarding |
| - | Following, we implement inelastic constitutive models for large strain problems. In the elasto-plastic model, we adopt von Mises yeld criteria and kinematic hardening based on the Armstrong-Frederick law. The formulation is then generalized to the visco-plastic case, where we consider Perzyna model associated with Norton' | + | //{{ youtube> |
| - | + | ||
| - | //{{ youtube> | + | |
| + | \\ | ||
| For the contact problem, we employ the Node-to-Segment strategy, imposing non-penetration conditions with the introduction of Lagrange multipliers. To show the potentialities of the developed code, several numerical examples are proposed, some of which inspired by existing manufacturing processes. On these examples, we study the effects of different material parameters and strain rates on the numerical response, allowing an analysis of the dissipative behavior due to plasticity and viscosity, including the influence of these on the dynamic damping. Some of these examples are shown in the videos below. | For the contact problem, we employ the Node-to-Segment strategy, imposing non-penetration conditions with the introduction of Lagrange multipliers. To show the potentialities of the developed code, several numerical examples are proposed, some of which inspired by existing manufacturing processes. On these examples, we study the effects of different material parameters and strain rates on the numerical response, allowing an analysis of the dissipative behavior due to plasticity and viscosity, including the influence of these on the dynamic damping. Some of these examples are shown in the videos below. | ||
| - | //{{ youtube> | + | //{{ youtube> |
| //Authors: // | //Authors: // | ||
plasticity.1583932932.txt.gz · Last modified: by pericles
